Projects
Evaluating
Flag State Performance
High Seas Task Force on IUU Fishing
OceanLaw Consultants
provided programme support to the
High Seas Task
Force on IUU Fishing (HSTF) which included
developing research plans for evaluations concerning port State and
flag State controls; contributing to a workshop (and the publication
of an accompanying Task Force background paper); and carrying out an
evaluation of flag State performance (by developing a methodology to
assess flag State performance in addressing IUU fishing and carrying
out an indicative evaluation using that methodology). The evaluation
also informed the Task Force's final report.
The general aim of the guidelines developed by OceanLaw,
and as conceived by the Task Force, was to establish an objective
list of the responsibilities that those involved in the high seas
fishing industry, including States, regional fisheries management
organizations (RFMOs), fishers and consumers, might reasonably expect
of flag States in respect of their fishing vessels. The guidelines
were to seek to elaborate a set of basic criteria by which the most
fundamental elements of flag State performance could be assessed
with two main purposes:
(1) to evaluate the performance of individual flag States against
a range of basic indicators relevant to IUU fishing on the high
seas; and
(2) to give publicity to those that fall short of desirable
standards.
Part I, of the report contains introductory guidance and outlines
the background and scope of the guidelines, and describes the
criteria used in the analysis.
Part II presents the results of the analysis in table form for
more than 150 coastal / flag States. Against each assessment
criterion, possible negative performance by a coastal State is
indicated by means of a black dot. This is not designed as a
definitive evaluation of flag State performance, but rather a
prototype to promote further discussion, evaluation and development.
Part III presents the detailed results of the research which
contributed to the evaluation, along with the methodology used to
conduct the research, and may be read in conjunction with either
Part I or Part II.
OceanLaw also produced a background paper, written by
Andrew Serdy - HSTF/11
Introduction to the Draft Criteria for Flag State Assessment - which was produced as background material for a workshop
of invited experts and representatives of HSTF members held in Paris
in September 2005. The paper outlines the legal, practical and other
issues related to flag State duties (section 2) and proposes, and
discusses, potential criteria for assessment (section 3).
Andrew Serdy presented the
results of the OceanLaw study to the
Chatham
House Update and Stakeholder Consultation Meeting on IUU Fishing,
a follow-up to the High Seas Task Force organized by Chatham House
in May 2006 (click here to view
presentation).
Evaluating Flag
State Performance: Parts I and II
Evaluating Flag State
Performance: Parts III
HSTF/11: Introduction
to the Draft Criteria for Flag State Assessment
Chatham House Presentation
Report
of the Chatham House Update and Stakeholder Consultation
Closing the Net: Final Report of the High Seas Task Force
High Seas Task
Force Website
Back to Projects homepage
|