| ||||||
Introduction 1. In the context of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries and its
overall objective of sustainable fisheries, the issues of excess fishing
capacity in world fisheries is an increasing concern. Excessive fishing capacity
is a problem that, among others, contributes substantially to overfishing, the
degradation of marine fisheries resources, the decline of food production
potential, and significant economic waste. 2. The Code of Conduct provides that States should take measures to prevent
or eliminate excess fishing capacity and should ensure that levels of fishing
effort are commensurate with sustainable use of fishery resources. 3. At its last Session in 1997, the Committee on Fisheries (COFI), requested
FAO to address the issue of fishing capacity. FAO organized a Technical Working
Group on the Management of Fishing Capacity in La Jolla, USA, from 15 to 18
April 1998. A subsequent FAO consultation was held in Rome from 26 to 30 October
1998, preceded by a preparatory meeting from 22 to 24 July 1998.
PART
I - Nature and Scope of the International Plan of Action 4. The International Plan of Action is voluntary. It has been elaborated
within the framework of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries as
envisaged by Article 2 (d). The provisions of Article 3 of the Code apply to the
interpretation and application of this International Plan of Action and its
relationship with other international instruments. 5. This document is in furtherance of the commitment of all States[1]
to implement the Code of Conduct. States and regional[2]
fisheries organizations should apply this document consistently with
international law and within the framework of the respective competencies of the
organizations concerned. 6. The International Plan of Action constitutes an element of fishery
conservation and sustainable management.
PART
II - Objective and Principles 7. The immediate objective of the International Plan of Action is for States
and regional fisheries organizations, to achieve world-wide, preferably by 2003
but not later than 2005, an efficient, equitable and transparent management of
fishing capacity. Inter alia, States and regional fisheries organizations
confronted with an overcapacity problem, where capacity is undermining
achievement of long-term sustainability outcomes, should endeavour initially to
limit at present level and progressively reduce the fishing capacity applied to
affected fisheries. Where long-term sustainability outcomes are being achieved,
States and regional fisheries organizations nevertheless need to exercise
caution to avoid growth in capacity undermining long-term sustainability
objectives. 8. The above objective may be achieved through a series of actions related
to four major strategies:
These
strategies may be implemented through complementary mechanisms to promote
implementation of this international Plan of Action: awareness building and
education, technical co-operation at the international level, and co-ordination.
9. The management of fishing capacity should be based on the Code of Conduct
for Responsible Fisheries and take into consideration the following major
principles and approaches:
10. The implementation of the International Plan of Action should be based on
the Code of Conduct, particularly Article 5, in relation to enhancing the
ability of developing countries, to develop their own fisheries as well as to
participate in high seas fisheries, including access to such fisheries, in
accordance with their legitimate rights and their obligations under
international law.
PART
III: Urgent Actions
Section
I: Assessment and monitoring of fishing capacity 11. States should support coordinated efforts and research at national,
regional and global levels to better understand the fundamental aspects of
issues related to the measurement and monitoring of fishing capacity. 12. States should support the organization by FAO of a technical consultation
to be held as early as possible in 1999 on the definition and measurement of
fishing capacity and the subsequent preparation of technical guidelines for data
collection and analysis, noting that the result of this consultation should
provide specific guidance for preliminary assessments of fishing capacity and
excess fishing capacity at national, regional and global levels.
Diagnosis
and identification of fisheries and fleets requiring urgent measures 13. States should proceed, by the end of 2000, with a preliminary assessment
of the fishing capacity deployed at the national level in relation to all the
fleets of principal fisheries and update this assessment periodically. 14. States should proceed, by the end of 2001, with the systematic
identification of national fisheries and fleets requiring urgent measures and
update this analysis periodically. 15. States should cooperate, within the same time frame, in the organization
of similar preliminary assessments of fishing capacity at the regional level
(within the relevant regional fisheries organizations or in collaboration with
them, as appropriate) and at the global level (in collaboration with FAO) for
transboundary, straddling, highly migratory and high seas fisheries, as well as
in the identification of regional or global fisheries and fleets requiring
urgent measures.
Establishment
of records of fishing vessels 16. States should support FAO in the development of appropriate and
compatible standards for records of fishing vessels. 17. States should develop and maintain appropriate and compatible national
records of fishing vessels, further specifying conditions for access to
information. 18. While awaiting the entry into force of the Agreement to Promote
Compliance with International Conservation and Management Measures by Fishing
Vessels on the High Seas (Compliance Agreement), States should support the
establishment by FAO by the end of 2000 of an international record of fishing
vessels operating in the high seas, following the model indicated in the
Compliance Agreement.
Section
II: Preparation and implementation of national plans 19. States should develop, implement and monitor national plans of action for
managing fishing capacity, taking into account, inter alia, the effect of
different resource management systems on fishing capacity. 20. States should develop the means to monitor fishing capacity
systematically and accurately, and to regularly assess any imbalance with
available fishery resources and management objectives. 21. States should develop, adopt and make public, by the end of 2002,
national plans for the management of fishing capacity and, if required, reduce
fishing capacity in order to balance fishing capacity with available resources
on a sustainable basis. These should be based on an assessment of fish stocks
and giving particular attention to cases requiring urgent measures and taking
immediate steps to address the management of fishing capacity for stocks
recognized as significantly overfished. 22. States should give due consideration, in the development of national
plans, to socio-economic requirements, including the consideration of
alternative sources of employment and livelihood to fishing communities which
must bear the burden of reductions in fishing capacity. 23. When it has been found that a national plan to manage capacity is not
necessary, States should ensure that the matter of fishing capacity is addressed
in an ongoing manner in fishery management. 24. At least every four years, States should review the implementation of
their national plans to manage capacity for the purpose of identifying cost
effective strategies for increasing effectiveness.
Subsidies
and economic incentives 25. When developing their national plans for the management of fishing
capacity, States should assess the possible impact of all factors, including
subsidies, contributing to overcapacity on the sustainable management of their
fisheries, distinguishing between factors, including subsidies, which contribute
to overcapacity and unsustainability and those which produce a positive effect
or are neutral. 26. States should reduce and progressively eliminate all factors, including
subsidies and economic incentives and other factors which contribute, directly
or indirectly, to the build-up of excessive fishing capacity thereby undermining
the sustainability of marine living resources, giving due regard to the needs of
artisanal fisheries. Regional considerations 27. States should cooperate, where appropriate, through regional fisheries
organizations or arrangements and other forms of co-operation, with a view to
ensuring the effective management of fishing capacity. 28. States should strive to collaborate through FAO and through international
arrangements in research, training and the production of information and
educational material aiming to promote effective management of fishing capacity.
Section
III: International considerations 29. States should consider participating in international agreements which
relate to the management of fishing capacity, and in particular, the Compliance
Agreement and the Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 relating to
the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory
Fish Stocks. 30. States should support co-operation and the exchange of information among
all regional fisheries organizations in accordance with their procedures. 31. States should take steps to manage the fishing capacity of their vessels
involved in high seas fisheries and cooperate, as appropriate with other States,
in reducing the fishing capacity applied to overfished high seas stocks. 32. States should improve, through regional fisheries organizations where
appropriate, and in collaboration with FAO, the collection of data on catches on
the high seas as well as in the coastal area by their fleet. 33. States should recognize the need to deal with the problem of those States
which do not fulfil their responsibilities under international law as flag
States with respect to their fishing vessels, and in particular those which do
not exercise effectively their jurisdiction and control over their vessels which
may operate in a manner that contravenes or undermines the relevant rules of
international law and international conservation and management measures. States
should also support multilateral co-operation to ensure that such flag States
contribute to regional efforts to manage fishing capacity. 34. States should be encouraged to become members of regional fisheries
organizations or arrangements, or agree to apply the conservation and management
measures established by such organizations or arrangements to their vessels. 35. States should promote, with the assistance of FAO, the exchange of
information about the fishing activity of vessels which do not comply with
conservation and management measures adopted by regional fisheries organizations
and arrangements, consistent with Article VI of the Compliance Agreement. 36. Anticipating the entry into force of the Compliance Agreement, States
should strive to apply the provisions of Article III of that Agreement. 37. States should ensure that no transfer of capacity to the jurisdiction of
another State should be carried out without the express consent and formal
authorization of that State. 38. States should, in compliance with their duties as flag States, avoid
approving the transfer of vessels flying their flag to high seas areas where
such transfers are inconsistent with responsible fishing under the Code of
Conduct.
Section
IV: Immediate actions for major international fisheries requiring urgent
measures 39. States should take immediate steps to address the management of fishing
capacity for international fisheries requiring urgent attention, with priority
being given to those harvesting transboundary, straddling, highly migratory and
high seas stocks which are significantly overfished. 40. Within the framework of their respective competencies, States should act
individually, bilaterally and multilaterally, as appropriate, to reduce
substantially[3]
the fleet capacity applied to these resources as part of management strategies
to restore overfished stocks to sustainable levels considering, in addition to
the other relevant provisions of the International Plan of Action:
PART
IV: Mechanisms to promote implementation Awareness
building and education 41. States should develop information programmes at national, regional and
global levels to increase awareness about the need for the management of fishing
capacity, and the cost and benefits resulting from adjustments in fishing
capacity.
Scientific
and technical co-operation 42. States should support the exchange of scientific and technical
information on issues related to the management of fishing capacity and promote
its world-wide availability using existing regional and global fora. 43. States should support training and institutional strengthening and
consider providing financial, technical and other assistance to developing
countries on issues related to the management of fishing capacity.
Reporting 44. States should report to FAO on progress on assessment, development and
implementation of their plans for the management of fishing capacity as part of
their biennial reporting to FAO on the Code of Conduct.
Role
of FAO 45. FAO will, as and to the extent directed by its Conference, collect all
relevant information and data which might serve as a basis for further analysis
aimed at identifying factors contributing to overcapacity such as, inter
alia, lack of input and output control, unsustainable fishery management
methods and subsidies which contribute to overcapacity. 46. FAO will, as and to the extent directed by its Conference, and as part of
its Regular Programme activities, support States in the implementation of their
national plans for the management of fishing capacity. 47. FAO will, as directed by its Conference, support development and
implementation of national plans for the management of fishing capacity through
specific, in-country technical assistance projects with Regular Programme funds
and by use of extra-budgetary funds made available to the Organization for this
purpose. 48. FAO will, through COFI, report biennially on the state of progress in the
implementation of the International Plan of Action. _______ [1] In this document the term "State" includes Members and non-members of FAO and applies mutatis mutandis also to "fishing entities" other than States. [2] In this document, the term "regional" incudes sub-regional, as appropriate. [3]
The required reduction
would vary from fishery to fishery; e.g. a 20 to 30% reduction was
mentioned for large-scale tuna long line fleet (Technical Working Group on
the Management of Fishing Capacity, 15-18 April 1998, FAO Fisheries Report
No. 586).
|
Internet
Guide to International Fisheries Law |